The Republican nominee is using his own proposed infrastructure bill to push for a tax cut for the wealthy and for infrastructure projects that boost construction jobs, but he’s missing the fact that the country’s already struggling with a severe shortage of roads and bridges and that’s a big part of why the plan is a disaster.
Trump’s proposal would allow the wealthy to pay much lower taxes than they do today on their earnings, and that would help build the roads and other infrastructure needed to keep America moving forward.
But it also would hurt the economy by driving up construction costs, especially in the short term, and by reducing jobs and the amount of revenue available to build infrastructure.
The GOP plan would cut $200 billion from the U.S. economy over the next decade, a substantial chunk of the budget deficit.
Trump says he will give $3 trillion to the states to help fund infrastructure projects.
That’s the same amount the GOP is proposing to cut from federal infrastructure spending, and it’s true that the GOP has proposed reducing federal infrastructure funding by more than $2 trillion over the last 10 years.
But that’s not the whole story.
Trump is proposing cutting infrastructure spending in ways that could actually harm the economy.
He wants to cut taxes, and he wants to reduce funding for infrastructure.
And he wants that money to come from the wealthy.
That means that while Trump is cutting taxes, the rich will get a tax break.
The plan that Trump is putting forward calls for lowering the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 20 percent and to cutting taxes for individuals and businesses.
That sounds good, right?
But that doesn’t actually make sense.
According to data from the Tax Policy Center, a nonpartisan, independent think tank, there are some tax breaks that could boost the economy, including tax credits for job creation and investment.
That data also shows that while the wealthiest Americans would benefit from these tax breaks, there’s little evidence that they would benefit significantly.
The Trump campaign didn’t respond to multiple requests for comment about these proposals.
The Tax Policy Centre found that over the past five years, the top 0.1 percent of earners paid more in taxes than the bottom 90 percent of Americans.
Over the same period, the middle 20 percent of the population paid just under half as much as the top 1 percent.
This means that if the tax cuts that Trump proposes to cut don’t help the middle class, it would be difficult to argue that they’re helping the middle income.
So why are Republicans proposing this plan?
The proposal is a continuation of Trump’s past efforts to increase taxes on the wealthy, and a continuation in that plan is not a good thing.
If you’re going to cut the top tax rate for the rich, you have to also cut taxes on middle class Americans.
The top rate on high earners is currently 35 percent.
That tax rate is scheduled to go down to 15 percent in 2019, when the middle rate on wages is expected to come down to 23.5 percent.
There are other ways to raise taxes on income, including a proposal Trump made last year to increase the corporate income tax rate.
The nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation estimates that the corporate rate on income over $1 million would go from 21 percent to 25 percent.
But the Joint Committee says that this proposal would not generate much revenue, since it would only raise revenue by lowering taxes for the wealthiest.
But if Trump wants to raise $3.5 trillion over 10 years, he’s going to have to pay for those tax cuts with lower taxes on other Americans.
That includes the rich.
That would hurt working families, and if Trump’s plan doesn’t raise revenue, it’s hard to see how it’s helping the economy at all.
So let’s get one thing straight: The GOP’s infrastructure plan is bad for the economy and bad for middle-class Americans.
This isn’t a question of who’s right.
The American people are sick and tired of politicians who lie about their plans, and they’re sick and angry that politicians are making promises about their infrastructure plans that aren’t kept.
They need to get real about how they’re going have to deal with a massive infrastructure crisis in the United States, not a political game of political horse-trading.
Follow Allie Conti on Twitter.